BigSlick
02-19-2010, 10:59 PM
I've been giving em a hard look on paper.
I see they've changed 2-3 times over the years.
Which to consider, which to avoid ?
I'm thinking 22-250 right now, but that might change.
Any real difference between shooting a XP100 and a contender/encore ? I know there are other differences (easy barrel/caliber changes, addictive nature of the contender platform), but from a shooting standpoint are there any differences to consider ?
I'm thinking the "R" version with the removable mag, but removable mags on rifles can be a serious PITA at times. I don't mind a blind feed or a hiinged floorplate, I just don't see where the XP100 was ever offered in that configuration. Maybe I missed it, not sure.
If ya own one now, or have in the past, how is/was it from an owning and using it perspective ?
I see they've changed 2-3 times over the years.
Which to consider, which to avoid ?
I'm thinking 22-250 right now, but that might change.
Any real difference between shooting a XP100 and a contender/encore ? I know there are other differences (easy barrel/caliber changes, addictive nature of the contender platform), but from a shooting standpoint are there any differences to consider ?
I'm thinking the "R" version with the removable mag, but removable mags on rifles can be a serious PITA at times. I don't mind a blind feed or a hiinged floorplate, I just don't see where the XP100 was ever offered in that configuration. Maybe I missed it, not sure.
If ya own one now, or have in the past, how is/was it from an owning and using it perspective ?