BigSlick
06-08-2010, 08:14 PM
Some of you may have been around long enough to remember back in the day when 10mm bullets were 170 grain.
Now, since the advent of the 40, almost all are 180gr.
I see a 155 and 165 in some lineups as an option, along with the 135's.
I've run these, got some OK results, but none have equalled the accuracy of the 170's and getting to 1250 or so with a 170 can be done without beating you or your gun up.
I know, 40 outsells 10mm a zillion to one.
I gotta wonder if the fact that 40's run (the FBI loads anyway) a 180 just under 1000 fps has caused the mfrs (and data publishers) to just forget about the 10mm/170 and generate something that'll work instead of try and develop the best option for 10mm shooters.
If the 165 or 180 is so great, why the hell didn't the original 10mm loads come in those weights ? Have they discovered th 165/180 is better ?
If so, I don't see it.
I know, 5-10 grains doesn't make a hell of a difference, and at the time 41 AE was 170gr too, but I got some 170gr bullets that run flawlessly with excellent accuracy from the 10 and the 180 grain bullet from the same mfr (and others) just don't seem to deliver the same results. It ain't bad, but you can see a difference consistently.
I'm about out of the 170's and am either gonna hafta get the 170 outta my mind and start over from scratch to replace that load or wrap my head around why the 165 or 180 is better.
Now, since the advent of the 40, almost all are 180gr.
I see a 155 and 165 in some lineups as an option, along with the 135's.
I've run these, got some OK results, but none have equalled the accuracy of the 170's and getting to 1250 or so with a 170 can be done without beating you or your gun up.
I know, 40 outsells 10mm a zillion to one.
I gotta wonder if the fact that 40's run (the FBI loads anyway) a 180 just under 1000 fps has caused the mfrs (and data publishers) to just forget about the 10mm/170 and generate something that'll work instead of try and develop the best option for 10mm shooters.
If the 165 or 180 is so great, why the hell didn't the original 10mm loads come in those weights ? Have they discovered th 165/180 is better ?
If so, I don't see it.
I know, 5-10 grains doesn't make a hell of a difference, and at the time 41 AE was 170gr too, but I got some 170gr bullets that run flawlessly with excellent accuracy from the 10 and the 180 grain bullet from the same mfr (and others) just don't seem to deliver the same results. It ain't bad, but you can see a difference consistently.
I'm about out of the 170's and am either gonna hafta get the 170 outta my mind and start over from scratch to replace that load or wrap my head around why the 165 or 180 is better.