View Full Version : RN vs FN
Geoff of WA
02-09-2011, 09:53 AM
What's the functional difference between Round Nose and Flat Nose bullets?
creophus
02-09-2011, 10:58 AM
Depending upon the firearm you may experience different results in feeding.
Flat nose bullets often make a nice clean hole in paper targets and are prefered in some applications because of that.
A nice big meplat causes more tissue damage.
Round nose bullets will have a longer range all things being equal.
BoltNut
02-09-2011, 02:15 PM
Crap...you fooled me with "RN"... :-/
lcarreau
02-09-2011, 06:28 PM
What Creo said. FN can be pretty satisfying for range work. I am not aware of any other practical benefit.
-Lonnie
gokyo
02-09-2011, 08:14 PM
I think with a FN you can get a heavier bullet with the same LOA.
mbradst
02-09-2011, 09:52 PM
BN was on the right track, RN's are pretty cool.
Glooooock
02-10-2011, 06:10 AM
What's the functional difference between Round Nose and Flat Nose bullets?
Flat nose slugs cut clean holes in paper , you get more contact area to the rifling with certain weights / calibers .
BoltNut
02-10-2011, 08:56 AM
Would there be more lead fouling if the bullet is in the groove more?
Rollis
02-19-2011, 12:24 AM
Seams to me most fouling would be a case of pressure, and, hardness, rather than length of time.
nitesite
02-19-2011, 03:05 AM
You'll hardly ever see RN in the .40/10mm bullet.
I think it's because the .40 was developed to fit in 9mm-framed guns that have shorter magazines than the 10mm or .45Auto frames.
So to allow the .40S&W round to fit in a 9mm-length magazine it had to be a FN.
I guess you could have a round nose .40-cal bullet in a 9mm frame, but it then would have to be a .40GAP. :)
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.