thorn
03-12-2008, 02:42 PM
I'm starting my first round of ...erm... rounds... using Hornady 125gr FMJ bullets. One day I'll probably switch to plated, but I decided I'd start with a more mainstream (aka: expensive as hell) component to minimize some guesswork.
But of course, guesswork is popping up anyway. I'm using near-minimum charges of HS-6 to start, and can't find an OAL for that powder and this particular bullet. Here's some load data I have found:
125 GR. LCN HS-6 1.125" min 5.9 1023 max 6.6 1124
125 GR. SIE FMJ HS-6 1.090" min 6.4 1131 max 6.8 1169
130 GR. SIE FMJ HS-6 1.120" min 6.3 981 max 6.6 1090
147 GR. HDY XTP HS-6 1.100" min 4.3 773 max 5.0 885 I also put some WWB 115 Factory 9mm on my caliper: 1.160".
Now I'll go ahead and say that I realize that the data listed is only what the company tested, and that it means that THIS particular combo (powder + bullet + OAL) was "safe and ok". But what kinda throws a wrench into my thinking is this:
The 125 lead is longer than 125 FMJ. 130 is shorter, 147 is in the middle - and WWB is almost at SAAMI max length. Huh? Why is Winchester loading their bullet so high? My guess is that it's erring towards very low pressures for safety, and their hope that it will feed the most reliably in most guns.
Based on a ton of reading others' discussions on their recipes, it appears to me that i'm free (within powder safety levels) to use anything from 1.090 - 1.160. The 1.090 seems awfully short to me, when I compare it to the WWB... honestly, I'm a bit afraid to seat it that low.
My first instinct is to just use 1.125" @ 6.2gr and see how well it performs.
If anyone has a better way for me to approach it (or possibly official Hornady data) I'd appreciate all advice. :)
thorn
But of course, guesswork is popping up anyway. I'm using near-minimum charges of HS-6 to start, and can't find an OAL for that powder and this particular bullet. Here's some load data I have found:
125 GR. LCN HS-6 1.125" min 5.9 1023 max 6.6 1124
125 GR. SIE FMJ HS-6 1.090" min 6.4 1131 max 6.8 1169
130 GR. SIE FMJ HS-6 1.120" min 6.3 981 max 6.6 1090
147 GR. HDY XTP HS-6 1.100" min 4.3 773 max 5.0 885 I also put some WWB 115 Factory 9mm on my caliper: 1.160".
Now I'll go ahead and say that I realize that the data listed is only what the company tested, and that it means that THIS particular combo (powder + bullet + OAL) was "safe and ok". But what kinda throws a wrench into my thinking is this:
The 125 lead is longer than 125 FMJ. 130 is shorter, 147 is in the middle - and WWB is almost at SAAMI max length. Huh? Why is Winchester loading their bullet so high? My guess is that it's erring towards very low pressures for safety, and their hope that it will feed the most reliably in most guns.
Based on a ton of reading others' discussions on their recipes, it appears to me that i'm free (within powder safety levels) to use anything from 1.090 - 1.160. The 1.090 seems awfully short to me, when I compare it to the WWB... honestly, I'm a bit afraid to seat it that low.
My first instinct is to just use 1.125" @ 6.2gr and see how well it performs.
If anyone has a better way for me to approach it (or possibly official Hornady data) I'd appreciate all advice. :)
thorn