PDA

View Full Version : Gun Review: Taurus PT-99/92


chewy
03-09-2009, 03:19 PM
Part I: Why

I have had a total of 5 Taurus Pt-92s and/or PT-99s during the last 12 years and here be what my experience has been with them.
First, a brief story of why I chose Taurus over a Beretta 92. I was in college at the time, back in 1997, I believe. And I had some left over cash from scholarship and Work (partial owner of a family Painting Co. [least paid family member]). I had about $350.00-400.00 and had already been reading and judging for myself the pros and cons of Beretta vs. Taurus. I initially WANTED a Beretta cuz I thought they were cool, which they are. But I didn’t have enough. I kept returning to the Gun Shop down the street on Central Ave. in Albuquerque and would bug the hell outta’ them guys at the counter every chance I had tryin’ to decide which one I should get. I never been one to just buy a gun, or guitar, without at least some info on it.

So back and forth I went with the pros and cons. The only thing I didn’t like about the Beretta was the decocker/safety on the slide. I kept tellin’ myself I’d get used to it. Then I’d handle the Taurus 92 and rackin’ the slide was smooth and un-awkward, as it was with the Beretta. I didn’t like the wooden grips too much as they made it a bit chunkier, but I really-really liked the pre-decocker safty on the slide, which enabled it to be carried “cocked and locked”. Something the Beretta 92’s left many moons ago. The chunky wooden grips were easy to deal with as I got a pair of Houge rubber grips for it, which my brother still has on it. It had a bit more slide frame wobble than I what I read was desirable, but it wasn’t that bad at all. Not any more than any of the other used Autos they had in the store. Oh, the Taurus also had adjustable sights, an option I have not seen on a Beretta 92. One other fact that was swaying my decision toward the Taurus, I could modify Beretta mags to fit a Taurus PT-92, but could not modify a Taurus mag to a Beretta. The finish on the Beretta looked way more superior than the Taurus. That was certain. The Taurus finish even had a blemish on it’s blued slide. The deal breaker for me was that the Taurus had a lifetime warranty, even if bought used. And I’d have almost $100.00 for then very affordable ammo (a little over 1000 rounds of Wolf 9mm) to shoot the up coming weekend! So I bought the Taurus PT-99, waited 10 minutes for the NICS check, then took it and some ammo back to my Apartment.

With adjustable sights, that pistol has always shot true. It’s been awhile, but I remember shootin’ about a 4 inch group with it freehand style standing up at around 20-ish yards. I’m sure it could do better than me. I remember when cleaning that barrel there was no rough spots where the cleaning patch would get slowed down by rough barreling as on my most recent PT-92. Who ever had that gun before me shot it often as the barrel looked well used but well taken care of, clean and nice and smooth. Here are some pics my bother sent me of my ‘ol college apartment guard. I’ll get him to bring this weekend on his visit for some group shootin’.
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k298/chewybaca67/100_2289.jpg
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k298/chewybaca67/100_2292.jpg

Tadjman
03-09-2009, 03:43 PM
you know, I'm no expert in most things... but as pretty as a Beretta is ( and what's an Italian without style... right? ) when I shot the .40 Beretta I couldn't find the barn, let alone hitting it. one gun and one day of shooting doesn't provide accurate coparison fodder, but Taurus does it's business and does it very well.

Boge
03-09-2009, 06:05 PM
I remember when dealer cost on a Taurus 92 was $199 in 1985. I should have bought one. I always shot one well. My only complaint being that it is a big gun for my medium hands. Ironically, Taurus never had slides flying off like some Beretta 92's had. The reason was the faulty steel Beretta used at one time.

Nice write up.

Fatdaddy
03-09-2009, 07:06 PM
I've had a PT-92 since 1990. I bought it for the same $ reasons you did not to mention growing up watching Lethal Weapon and Mel G's Character brandishing one. I always thought I was missing something by not owning the real deal Berretta. A few years ago I got an unbelievable deal on a used Berretta 92, finally I had the real thing. I really liked it except for the slide mounted safety, some parts are even interchangeble with the Taurus. I'm not sure why Berretta moved away from the frame mounted safety in the first place.

I'm not sure if it's just the round count or just the way it's made but my PT-92's action feels like it has slick glass rails when cycled.

After keeping the Berretta a few months I realized it didn't offer anything over my Taurus, other than the brand name, so I sold it for a nice profit.

MONTEGOD7SS
03-09-2009, 07:31 PM
Buddy of mine had a Beretta that got a constant diet of L7A1 subgun ammo until the slide hit the dirt in front of him one day when he racked it. Picked up the pieces, chop sawed them in half, in the trash she went. Overall it was pretty strong to have went through literally thousands and thousands of +P+++ Hirtenberger 9mm, but in the end it lost the battle.

creophus
03-25-2009, 10:49 AM
That's a nice write up Chewy. Why did you sell/give it to your brother?

chewy
03-25-2009, 10:54 AM
Cuz I had my Stainless one and he really liked shootin' it. During his last visit, 2 weekends ago, he left it for me to shoot some. I'll probably have for the next year or so. I finally casted up some 9mm boolits so I load some up for this weekend and post some pics of the results along with a comparison with my Newer, to me, PT-92 with a Rail and such.

creophus
03-25-2009, 10:57 AM
Cool. I look forward to hearing more about those bullets.