Oreo
04-14-2009, 10:39 PM
So, I was heavily cautioned about using the GLOCK OE barrel with hot loads in the G20. Turned out to not be an issue.
Using Longshot + 180gn GoldDot JHP + Wolf primer, **NEW starline brass**, 1.250" oal I worked all the way up to 9.7gn of powder.
** 9.5gn of Longshot is max book data for this cartridge. **
Notes: the edges of the Wolf primers, normally rounded flattened right out even at book MINIMUM charge weights (8.5gn) which leads me to believe the Wolf large pistol primers are not as hard as the CCI small pistol primers I'm used to. Very close inspection & comparison revealed that the heavier the charge weight was the more the primer cup flowed to a larger diameter. The difference between min & max charge primer diameter is only apparent by direct comparison though. One of five test loads at 9.7gn showed a razor-thin line of soot half way around the rim of the primer.
At 9.5-9.7 charge weights I noticed what I can only describe as increased stress on the brass where one would normally see the typcial GLOCK pregnant belly. My loads did NOT have a pregnant belly and I can only chalk that up to the combination of new brass & the better chamber support of the current GLOCK barrel design.
Best accuracy was seen in the middle charge weights with noticeable loss of accuracy above 9.5gn.
Using Longshot + 180gn GoldDot JHP + Wolf primer, **NEW starline brass**, 1.250" oal I worked all the way up to 9.7gn of powder.
** 9.5gn of Longshot is max book data for this cartridge. **
Notes: the edges of the Wolf primers, normally rounded flattened right out even at book MINIMUM charge weights (8.5gn) which leads me to believe the Wolf large pistol primers are not as hard as the CCI small pistol primers I'm used to. Very close inspection & comparison revealed that the heavier the charge weight was the more the primer cup flowed to a larger diameter. The difference between min & max charge primer diameter is only apparent by direct comparison though. One of five test loads at 9.7gn showed a razor-thin line of soot half way around the rim of the primer.
At 9.5-9.7 charge weights I noticed what I can only describe as increased stress on the brass where one would normally see the typcial GLOCK pregnant belly. My loads did NOT have a pregnant belly and I can only chalk that up to the combination of new brass & the better chamber support of the current GLOCK barrel design.
Best accuracy was seen in the middle charge weights with noticeable loss of accuracy above 9.5gn.